The role of timing of high-dose cytosine arabinoside intensification and of maintenance therapy in the treatment of children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia
- 15 September 1990
- Vol. 66 (6), 1106-1113
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1106::aid-cncr2820660605>3.0.co;2-y
Abstract
The Children's Cancer Study Group instituted a pilot study to investigate the use of high doses of cytosine arabinoside (AraC) in the intensification phase of treatment for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL). Patients achieving remission and not eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were treated with four doses of high‐dose AraC and L‐asparaginase. These drugs were repeated either on or after 28 days (q28 days), after recovery of hematologic parameters (for the first 49 patients entered onto this trial); or after 7 days (q7 days), despite dropping blood counts (for the last 53 patients enrolled). After completing an additional 3 months of intensification therapy, patients were then allocated by physician choice to either discontinue therapy or receive 18 28‐day cycles of maintenance therapy, including the daily administration of 6‐thioguanine. Despite three deaths associated with the toxicity of the aggressive (q7 days) AraC timing, patients receiving this approach demonstrated equal or better disease‐free survival from the end of induction (55% versus 42% actuarially at 3 years [P = 0.52]). Maintenance therapy appeared to play no role in improving outcome for people who received the aggressive timing of AraC cycles. Fifty‐nine percent were alive disease free actuarially at 3 years from the decision to not give maintenance therapy (n = 27) compared with 62% for those receiving maintenance therapy (n = 16; P = 0.49). On the other hand, patients who received the less aggressive AraC intensification timing (q28 days) had an improved survival rate if maintenance therapy was administered (n = 17) (65% versus 39% for patients not receiving maintenance therapy [n = 24] at 3 years [P = 0.07]). Maintenance therapy therefore may not improve outcome in patients receiving aggressive timing of high‐dose AraC but may be important in less intensive postremission regimens in childhood ANLL.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Remission induction in children with acute non‐lymphocytic leukemia using cytosine arabinoside and doxorubicin or daunorubicin: A report from the childrens cancer study groupMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1989
- Maintenance chemotherapy prolongs remission duration in adult acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- LithotripsyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1985
- Improved treatment results in childhood acute myelogenous leukemia: a report of the German cooperative study AML-BFM-78Blood, 1985
- Two-cycle timed-sequential chemotherapy for adult acute nonlymphocytic leukemiaBlood, 1984
- A randomized comparison of postremission therapy in acute myelogenous leukemia: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group trialBlood, 1984
- ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKAEMIA: MAINTENANCE CHEMOTHERAPY AFTER EARLY CONSOLIDATION TREATMENT DOES NOT PROLONG SURVIVALThe Lancet, 1984
- Chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia in children and adults: VAPA updateBlood, 1983
- Current status of the biology and treatment of acute non-lymphocytic leukemia in children (report from the ANLL strategy group of the Children's Cancer Study GroupBlood, 1983
- Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test ProceduresJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1972