The effect of matching on the power of randomized community intervention studies
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 12 (3-4), 329-338
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780120315
Abstract
Currently, there is considerable interest in studies that use the community as the experimental unit. Health promotion programmes are one example. Because such activities are expensive, the number of experimental units (communities) is usually very small. Investigators often match communities on demographic variables in order to improve the power of their studies. Matching is known to improve power in certain circumstances. However, we show here that if the number of communities is small, the matched design will probably have less power than the unmatched design. This is due primarily to the loss of degrees of freedom in the matched design, which outweighs the benefits of matching on any but the strongest correlates of changes in behaviour. In the community intervention situation, even small differences in sample size between the matched and unmatched analyses can have expensive consequences.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Data analysis and sample size issues in evaluations of community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs: A mixed-model analysis of variance approachJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Assessing the gain in efficiency due to matching in a community intervention studyStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- A Review of Five Major Community-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Programs. Part I: Rationale, Design, and Theoretical FrameworkAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 1990
- Theory and delivery of health programming in the community: The Pawtucket Heart Health ProgramPreventive Medicine, 1987
- Theory and action for health promotion illustrations from the North Karelia Project.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- A comparison of statistical methods for evaluating risk factor changes in community-based studies: An example from the Stanford Three-Community StudyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- The Efficiency of Matched Samples: An Empirical InvestigationBiometrics, 1965
- The Power of Student's t-TestJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1965