Mechanism for Bupivacaine Depression of Cardiac Conduction
Open Access
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 62 (4), 396-405
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198504000-00006
Abstract
The effects of bupivacaine and lidocaine on cardiac conduction were compared in guinea pig ventricular muscle. Membrane potential was controlled using a single sucrose gap voltage clamp technique and the maximum upstroke velocity of the action potential (.ovrhdot.Vmax) was used as an indicator of peak Na current. Bupivacaine blocked cardiac Na channels in a time- and voltage-dependent fashion. Although bupivacaine has a low affinity for rested and activated Na channels, it avidly blocks inactivated channels (Kd = 9 .times. 10-7 M). Bupivacaine-associated channels do not conduct and have their voltage dependence of inactivation shifted by .apprx. 33 mV to more negative potentials. At bupivacaine concentrations > 0.2 .mu.g/ml, a substantial fraction of the channels become blocked during the cardiac action potential, while recovery from block during diastole proceeds relatively slowly with a time constant (.tau.) of 1557 .+-. 304 ms (n = 8). Thus, bupivacaine blocks Na channels in a fast-in-slow-out fashion and substantial block accumulates at 60-150 beats/min. A 5-10 .mu.g/ml dose of lidocaine blocks a substantial fraction of channels during the action potential, but diastolic recovery from block is more rapid (.tau. = 153.8 .+-. 51.2 ms, n = 4). Thus, lidocaine blocks channels in a fast-in-fast-out fashion. Even at toxic doses of lidocaine (i.e., 10 .mu.g/ml), little accumulation of block occurs at normal heart rates. Na channel block by bupivacaine can be minimized by reducing heart rate, hyperplorization and shortening of action potential duration. Alteration of these variables over clinically applicable ranges does not produce marked changes in bupivacaine effect. The results provide a possible explanation for the clinical observation that when bupivacaine accidently gains access to the general circulation, cardiac conduction can be depressed seriously and such depression may be difficult to reverse.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine on AV Conduction in the Isolated Rat HeartAnesthesiology, 1981
- Comparatibe actions of mexiletine on sodium channels in nerve, skeletal and cardiac muscleEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1981
- Test of a model of antiarrhythmic drug action. Effects of quinidine and lidocaine on myocardial conduction.Circulation, 1980
- Fast frequency-dependent block of action potential upstroke in rabbit atrium by small local anestheticsLife Sciences, 1979
- The relation of Vmax to INa, GNa, and h infinity in a model of the cardiac Purkinje fiberBiophysical Journal, 1979
- Validity of Vmax as a measure of the sodium current in cardiac and nervous tissuesBiophysical Journal, 1978
- Frequency-dependent Conduction BlockAnesthesiology, 1978
- RATES OF INTERACTION OF LOCAL-ANESTHETICS WITH SODIUM CHANNELS IN NERVE1978
- Time- and voltage-dependent interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with cardiac sodium channelsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes, 1977
- Local anesthetics: hydrophilic and hydrophobic pathways for the drug-receptor reaction.The Journal of general physiology, 1977