Rankings
Publications
Search Publications
Cited-By Search
Sources
Publishers
Scholars
Scholars
Top Cited Scholars
Organizations
About
Login
Register
Home
Publications
Resource costing for multinational neurologic clinical trials: methods and results
Home
Publications
Resource costing for multinational neurologic clinical trials: methods and results
Resource costing for multinational neurologic clinical trials: methods and results
KS
Kevin Schulman
Kevin Schulman
JB
Jennifer Burke
Jennifer Burke
MD
Michael Drummond
Michael Drummond
Linda Davies
Linda Davies
PC
Per Carlsson
Per Carlsson
JG
Jans Gruger
Jans Gruger
Anthony Harris
Anthony Harris
CL
Carlo Lucioni
Carlo Lucioni
RG
Ramon Gisbert
Ramon Gisbert
TL
Ted Llana
Ted Llana
ET
Eric Tom
Eric Tom
BB
Bernard Bloom
Bernard Bloom
See more
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Add to Library
Cite
Download
Share
Download
1 November 1998
journal article
costing methodology
Published by
Wiley
in
Health Economics
Vol. 7
(7)
,
629-638
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(1998110)7:7<629::aid-hec378>3.0.co;2-n
Abstract
We present the results of a multinational resource costing study for a prospective economic evaluation of a new medical technology for treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage within a clinical trial. The study describes a framework for the collection and analysis of international resource cost data that can contribute to a consistent and accurate intercountry estimation of cost. Of the 15 countries that participated in the clinical trial, we collected cost information in the following seven: Australia, France, Germany, the UK, Italy, Spain, and Sweden. The collection of cost data in these countries was structured through the use of worksheets to provide accurate and efficient cost reporting. We converted total average costs to average variable costs and then aggregated the data to develop study unit costs. When unit costs were unavailable, we developed an index table, based on a market‐basket approach, to estimate unit costs. To estimate the cost of a given procedure, the market‐basket estimation process required that cost information be available for at least one country. When cost information was unavailable in all countries for a given procedure, we estimated costs using a method based on physician‐work and practice‐expense resource‐based relative value units. Finally, we converted study unit costs to a common currency using purchasing power parity measures. Through this costing exercise we developed a set of unit costs for patient services and per diem hospital services. We conclude by discussing the implications of our costing exercise and suggest guidelines to facilitate more effective multinational costing exercises. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords
COST EFFECTIVENESS
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
ECONOMICS
COST IDENTIFICATION
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS
All Articles
Open Access
Cited by 78 articles