Optic synapse number but not density is constrained during regeneration onto surgically halved tectum in goldfish: HRP‐EM evidence that optic fibers compete for fixed numbers of postsynaptic sites on the tectum

Abstract

The number of optic synapses in the half tectum of goldfish was counted by using an improved HRP‐labeling protocol and a columnar sampling method that spanned the entire optic innervation layer, S‐SO‐SFGS. It was previously found by using this procedure in intact tectum that the normal number of optic synapses was regenerated by 30 days and maintained thereafter even in the absence of impulse activity. This suggested that the number of synapses in this system was intrinsically fixed. In order to examine whether this limit was imposed by optic fibers or by target cells, optic synapses were counted in surgically halved tecta which received compressed optic projections consisting of regenerating optic fibers from the entire retina. We reasoned that if synapse number is a function of the number of afferents, then there should be twice the normal number of optic synapses per column; on the other hand, if their number is fixed by target, then their number per column should be normal. We found that the number of optic (labeled) synapses was normal in sample columns from fish at 70 days and 160 days after optic nerve crush. Thus, retinal ganglion cells, on average, formed half as many synapses on the half tectum compared to intact tectum, indicating the number of optic synapses was limited by the tectum. The number of nonoptic (unlabeled) synapses was also found to be normal. By contrast, the S‐SO‐SFGS was found to be 88–103% thicker compared to normal fish, apparently because of a 20‐fold increase in the number of optic fibers. As a result, the density of synapses was about half normal in half tecta, and so, in contrast to synapse number, synaptic density is not constrained during regeneration. We infer from these data that optic fibers compete for limited numbers of postsynaptic sites during regeneration and suggest that this competition promotes neural map refinement and the various plasticities described for this projection.