A comparison of four patient immobilization devices in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with three dimensional conformal radiotherapy
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Vol. 34 (1), 213-219
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02094-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Immobilization improves the reproducibility of patient positioning during six-field conformal radiation therapy for prostate carcinomaInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- Online repositioning during treatment of the prostate: A study of potential limits and gainsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- Conformal static field radiation therapy treatment of early prostate cancer versus non-conformal techniques: A reduction in acute morbidityInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Dose escalation for stage C (T3) prostate cancer: minimal rectal toxicity observed using conformal therapyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1992
- Conformal static field therapy for low volume low grade prostate cancer with rigid immobilizationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practiceInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1985
- Patterns of care study: Hodgkin's disease relapse rates and adequacy of portalsCancer, 1983
- Weekly localization films and detection of field placement errorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1978
- The effect of immobilisation on localisation error in the radiotherapy of head and neck cancerClinical Radiology, 1976