RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF CYCLOSPORINE MONOTHERAPY VERSUS AZATHIOPRINE-PREDNISONE FROM THREE MONTHS AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1
Open Access
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 61 (7), 1038-1046
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199604150-00009
Abstract
Cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (Pred) are the mostly used drugs for immunosuppression after renal transplantation, but both drugs have marked side effects. Either replacement of CsA by azathioprine (Aza) or withdrawal of prednisone (Pred) resulting in CsA monotherapy can be employed to circumvent the adverse effects in the long run. Both treatment regimens were compared to this prospective randomized trial in patients who were treated with CsA and Pred during the first 3 months after renal transplantation (CsA: n=64, Aza-Pred: n=63, median duration of follow-up: 3.9 years). Estimated graft survival rates at 5 years after transplantation (in patients with a functioning graft at 3 months) were 78% in the CsA group and 87% in the Aza-Pred group. The incidence of a rejection within 3 months after start of steroid withdraw or conversion from CsA to Aza was 30% and 25% respectively (NS). At 2 years after transplantation, serum creatinine levels were lower in the Aza-Pred group (126+/-35 micromol/L) than in the CsA group (180+/-78 micromol/L; P>0.001). There were no differences in blood pressure or incidence of infections between the treatment groups. Treatment-related costs were measured during the first year after transplantation and were lower in the Aza-Pred group (DFL 40,882+/-18,895 vs. DFL 53,484+/-44,828; 1 DFL [Dutch guilder] is about US $0.60; P<0.005). In conclusion, CsA monotherapy and Aza-Pred treatment from 3 months after renal transplantation are comparably effective immunosuppressive treatment regimens, although Aza-Pred therapy results in better graft function. Withdrawal of steroids and replacement of CsA by Aza both carry a substantial risk of rejection. The previously demonstrated cost effectiveness of CsA-containing therapies seems to be limited to the first phase after transplantation. Conversion to Aza-Pred at 3 months after transplantation reduces costs.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECT OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS ON QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1995
- Beneficial effects of conversion from cyclosporin to azathioprine after kidney transplantationThe Lancet, 1995
- THE INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF EARLY REJECTION EPISODES ON GRAFT OUTCOME IN RECIPIENTS OF FIRST CADAVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTSTransplantation, 1992
- WITHDRAWAL OF STEROIDS AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION—CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME1Transplantation, 1992
- Conversion of stable renal allografts at one year from cyclosporin A to azathioprine: a randomized controlled studyTransplant International, 1990
- RENAL ALLOGRAFT BIOPSY AND CONVERSION OF CYCLOSPORINE TO AZATHIOPRINETransplantation, 1989
- Comparison of Three Immunosuppressive Regimens in Cadaver Renal Transplantation: Long-Term Cyclosporine, Short-Term Cyclosporine Followed by Azathioprine and Prednisolone, and Azathioprine and Prednisolone without CyclosporineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- COMPLETE REPLACEMENT OF METHYLPREDNISOLONE BY AZATHIOPRINE IN CYCLOSPORINE-TREATED PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1 Pressented at the 6th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Transplant Physicians, May 1987, Chicago, ILTransplantation, 1988
- A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CYCLOSPORINE IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION WITH CONVERSION TO AZATHIOPRINE AND PREDNISOLONE AFTER THREE MONTHSTransplantation, 1983
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976