Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation: Abandoning informed consent
Open Access
- 22 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Ethics
- Vol. 7 (1), 14-E14
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-7-14
Abstract
Background: Requirements for organ donation after cardiac or imminent death have been introduced to address the transplantable organs shortage in the United States. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) increasingly use the Internet for organ donation consent. Methods: An analysis of OPO Web sites available to the public for enrollment and consent for organ donation. The Web sites and consent forms were examined for the minimal information recommended by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for informed consent. Content scores were calculated as percentages of data elements in four information categories: donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, donation promotion, and informed consent. Results: There were 60 Web sites for organ donation enrollment serving the 52 states. The median percent (10 percentile-90 percentile) content scores of the Web sites for donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, and donation promotion were 33% (20–47), 79% (57–86), and 75% (50–100), respectively. The informed consent score was 0% (0–33). The content scores for donor knowledge and informed consent were significantly lower than donor consent reinforcement and donation promotion for all Web sites (P < .05). The content scores for the four categories were similar among the 11 regions of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Conclusion: The Web sites and consent forms for public enrollment in organ donation do not fulfill the necessary requirements for informed consent. The Web sites predominantly provide positive reinforcement and promotional information rather than the transparent disclosure of organ donation process. Independent regulatory oversight is essential to ensure that Internet enrollment for organ donation complies with legal and ethical standards for informed consent.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Organ Donation and Utilization, 1995–2004: Entering the Collaborative EraAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2006
- Liver and Intestine Transplantation in the United States, 1995–2004American Journal of Transplantation, 2006
- No Improvement in Long-Term Liver Transplant Graft Survival in the Last Decade: An Analysis of the UNOS DataAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2006
- Report of a National Conference on Donation after Cardiac DeathAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2006
- Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004American Journal of Transplantation, 2005
- Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Internet-based intervention to promote organ donor registry participation and family notification1,2Transplantation, 2003
- The Consent Process for Cadaveric Organ ProcurementJAMA, 2001
- Development of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Policy for the Care of Terminally Ill Patients Who May Become Organ Donors after Death Following the Removal of Life SupportKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1993