Isn't it time to reevaluate the sensitivity of noninvasive approaches for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease?
- 30 November 1986
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 8 (5), 1033-1034
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80378-3
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transluminal, subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity and vasodilator reserve in man.Circulation, 1985
- The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses.Circulation, 1984
- Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Editorial note Collapsing coronary stenosis — a Starling resistorInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenosis.Circulation, 1982
- Myocardial Salvage after Intracoronary Thrombolysis with Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- “Variant” angina: One aspect of a continuous spectrum of vasospastic myocardial ischemiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.Circulation, 1977
- Limitations of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigrams.Circulation, 1976
- Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.Circulation, 1975