Comparative strategies in the investigation of neural networks

Abstract

Comparative studies on nervous systems, though infrequently undertaken for the purpose of comparison, have yielded some important generalities about the formats of nervous networks, and about the cell biology of certain neural types. In the first category, it is clear that convergent evolutionary processes arrived at very similar networks to accomplish reciprocal and lateral inhibition, and load‐compensation in “resistance reflexes.” A newer general network format is described, command‐derived inhibition, in which the central nervous elements controlling a rapid movement deliver presynaptic inhibition to the terminals of sensory neurons that carry reafferent excitation from the movement. It is argued that such circuits occur in several groups of animals, and that they include as a special class the efferent inhibitory neurons innervating acoustico‐lateralis receptors in vertebrates. The properties of circuit elements that now seem to constitute useful generalizations include size principle (the inverse relationship between size and excitability in a variety of neurons), and the late differentiation of sensory neurons, failure to decussate, and their inability to mediate inhibition. Many other generalities have emerged, only to fall; one conclusion from such searches is that many supposedly “basic” properties of cell types or neural circuits are in fact not phylogenetically conservative, however much the physiologist may expect them to be.