Can wildlife pay its way?
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Oryx
- Vol. 28 (3), 163-168
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605300028519
Abstract
Conservation philosophy is swinging away from the traditional approach of setting up reserves to give absolute protection to wildlife and is replacing it with more realistic strategies. To succeed today, conservationists should take into account the needs of the people who share their land with wild species. The author examines some of the ways in which wildlife can be valuable to local people and made to pay for its own conservation – game viewing, sport hunting, game cropping and ranching. The advantages and pitfalls are discussed and it is concluded that while these uses are possible for some some wildlife species, others will never have a direct economic value. Someone will have to pay for their conservation – and it should not be those who can least afford it.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Population Model for the Management of the Saiga AntelopeJournal of Applied Ecology, 1994
- Isotope fingerprints in elephant bone and ivoryNature, 1990
- Source-area determination of elephant ivory by isotopic analysisNature, 1990
- Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: field studies of the body-water turnover of game and livestockThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979
- The role of commercial crocodile farming in crocodile conservationBiological Conservation, 1975
- The Tourist as an Agent for Development and Wildlife Conservation: The Case of KenyaInternational Journal of Social Economics, 1975