Feasibility of Dosimetry-Based High-Dose 131I-Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine with Topotecan as a Radiosensitizer in Children with Metastatic Neuroblastoma
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals
- Vol. 20 (2), 195-199
- https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2005.20.195
Abstract
Introduction: 131I-meta iodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) therapy is established palliation for relapsed neuroblastoma. The topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, topotecan, has direct activity against neuroblastoma and acts as a radiation sensitiser. These 2 treatments are synergistic in laboratory studies. Theoretically, the benefit of 131I-mIBG treatment could be enhanced by dose escalation and combination with topotecan. Haematological support would be necessary to overcome the myelosuppression, which is the dose-limiting toxicity. Aims: Firstly, one aim of this study was to establish whether in vivo dosimetry could be used to guide the delivery of a precise total whole-body radiation-absorbed dose of 4 Gy accurately from 2 131I-mIBG treatments. Secondly, the other aim of this study was to determine whether it is feasible to combine this treatment with the topotecan in children with metastatic neuroblastoma. Material and Methods: An activity of 131I-mIBG (12 mCi/kg, 444 MBq/kg), estimated to give a whole-body absorbed-radiation dose of approximately 2 Gy, was administered on day 1, with topotecan 0.7 mg/m2 administered daily from days 1–5. In vivo dosimetry was used to calculate a 2nd activity of 131I-mIBG, to be given on day 15 which would give a total whole-body dose of 4 Gy. A further 5 doses of topotecan were given from days 15–19. The myeloablative effect of this regimen was circumvented by peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow support. Results: Eight children with relapsed stage IV neuroblastoma were treated. The treatment was delivered according to protocol in all patients. There were no unanticipated side-effects. Satisfactory haematological reconstituition occurred in all patients. The measured total whole-body radiation-absorbed dose ranged from 3.7 Gy to 4.7 Gy (mean, 4.2 Gy). Conclusions: In vivo dosimetry allows for a specified total whole-body radiation dose to be delivered accurately. This schedule of intensification of 131I-mIBG therapy by dose escalation and radiosensitization with topotecan with a haemopoietic autograft is safe and practicable. This approach should now be tested for efficacy in a phase II clinical trial.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hematologic Toxicity of High-Dose Iodine-131–Metaiodobenzylguanidine Therapy for Advanced NeuroblastomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Absorbed Dose Ratios for Repeated Therapy of Neuroblastoma with I-131 mIBGCancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals, 2003
- Estimation and implications of random errors in whole-body dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2002
- Engraftment after myeloablative doses of131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation for treatment of refractory neuroblastomaMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1998
- DNA-Topoisomerase I, a new target for the treatment of neuroblastomaEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- Multi-modality megatherapy with [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine, high dose melphalan and total body irradiation with bone marrow rescue: Feasibility study of a new strategy for advanced neuroblastomaEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- The uptake and retention of metaiodobenzyl guanidine by the neuroblastoma cell line NB1-GBritish Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Treatment of advanced neuroblastoma with i-131 meta-iodobenzylguanidineCancer, 1991
- International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Toxicity from treatment of neuroblastoma with 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidineEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1988