New neuroretinal rim blood flow evaluation method combining Heidelberg retina flowmetry and tomography
Open Access
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 85 (3), 304-309
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.3.304
Abstract
AIM Accurate Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) measurements require correct manual setting of the HRF photodetector sensitivity. The neuroretinal rim produces a weak signal relative to the peripapillary retina. A newly developed HRF alignment and sensitivity protocol, capable of accurate rim measurement, was investigated. METHODS 18 eyes of nine healthy volunteers were examined by HRF. Three images of each eye were taken using three different imaging methods. Method 1: a conventional image (optic nerve head centred image with photodetector sensitivity optimised for the strong signal from the peripapillary retina); method 2: the setting of method 1 with photodetector sensitivity optimised for the weak signal from the rim; and method 3: the setting of method 2 with the temporal rim margin tangent to the lateral image border to remove the overpowering signal from the temporal peripapillary retina. The neuroretinal rim was defined by the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT). Blood flow and reflectivity values (DC component) in the rim area were compared for the three methods using pointwise analysis. Coefficients of variation of repeated measurements in 12 subjects have been calculated for method 3. RESULTS The neuroretinal rim area measured by method 1 had a significantly lower brightness compared with method 2 and 3 (p=0.0002 and p=0.0002, respectively). Method 2 provided proper sensitivity for the weak signals of the rim area based on rim tissue DC values; however, this sensitivity setting was too high for the strong signal from the peripapillary retina. Method 3 avoided the strong peripapillary signal with the proper signal from the rim and provided significantly higher flow values of the rim area at 75 and 90 percentile pixels (p=0.0065 and p=0.0038 respectively) compared with method 2. Interobserver repeatability ranged from 16.85% to 21.96% for the different parameters. CONCLUSIONS Method 3 provides an accurate and reproducible flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim area through proper sensitivity for the weak rim signal, alignment, and removal of the strong temporal signal from the image. This new method is recommended to improve accuracy of blood flow measurement in the neuroretinal rim.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heidelberg retinal flowmetry: factors affecting blood flow measurementBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 1998
- Confocal scanning laser Doppler flowmetry: experiments in a model flow system.1997
- Reproducibility of Retinal and Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow Measurements with Scanning Laser Doppler FlowmetryJournal of Glaucoma, 1997
- Reproducibility and sensitivity of scanning laser Doppler flowmetry during graded changes in PO2British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1997
- [A patient with rabies in The Netherlands].1997
- Zum Einfluß der Konturlinie auf die Exkavationsfläche beim Heidelberg Retina TomographKlinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 1996
- Principle, Validity, and Reliability of Scanning Laser Doppler FlowmetryJournal of Glaucoma, 1996
- The normalised rim/disc area ratio lineInternational Ophthalmology, 1996
- Two dimensional mapping of the perfusion of the retina and optic nerve head.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995
- Clinical investigation of the combination of a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and laser Doppler flowmeter.1995