Blood transfusion risk: protecting against the unknown
- 7 March 1998
- Vol. 316 (7133), 717-718
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7133.717
Abstract
News p 726 In relation to viruses— which, classically, have posed the greatest potential risk to transfusion recipients—British blood is among the safest in the world. For HIV, the risk per unit of transfusion is about 1 in 2.5 million.1 But British blood services are now faced with the challenge of managing a potential risk from the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, notably variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. This challenge is particularly difficult given the lack of firm data on either the likely scale of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease infection in Britain or the likelihood that the causative agent is present in and transmissible by donated blood. The announcement by the Department of Health, following advice from the Committee on Safety of Medicines, on 26 February of “further precautionary measures” in relation to the use of British plasma in blood products brings the challenge sharply into focus. In March 1997 the World Health Organisation concluded that there is no proved or even probable instance of transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood, blood components, or plasma derivatives, though it did identify a requirement to assess further the potential risk posed to transfusion by variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.2 Lack of evidence of risk is not evidence of absence …Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease transmitted in blood? Is the absence of evidence of risk evidence of the absence of risk?1997
- Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibodyNature, 1997
- Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Consensus Conference on Anti-D Prophylaxis 7 & 8 April 1997Transfusion Medicine, 1997
- Diagnosis of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by tonsil biopsyThe Lancet, 1997
- A SHOT in the arm for safer blood transfusionBMJ, 1996