European criteria for the appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization procedures
Open Access
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 18 (4), 380-387
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00530-3
Abstract
Objectives: Large variations in the use of coronary revascularization procedures have led many countries to apply the RAND appropriateness method toKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Project and MethodsEndoscopy, 1999
- European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Conclusion and WWW SiteEndoscopy, 1999
- The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical ProceduresNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Indications for coronary revascularisation: a Dutch perspective.Heart, 1997
- Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Ontario and New York State: Which Rate Is Right?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularizationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York StatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York StatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CORONARY DISEASE: COMPARISON OF DOCTORS' ATTITUDES IN THE USA AND THE UKThe Lancet, 1988