Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 189 (4), 330-336
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412
Abstract
Background Routine use of standardised outcome measures is not universal.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Routine outcome measurement by mental health-care providers: is it worth doing?The Lancet, 2002
- Reliable Self-Report of Health Service Use by Individuals With Serious Mental IllnessPsychiatric Services, 2002
- Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measuresThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic reviewBMJ, 2001
- Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001
- A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO STOCHASTIC COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2001
- Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve healthBMJ, 2000
- Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG): the development of a valid and brief scale to assess the severity of mental illnessSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2000
- Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1998