The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 8 (1), 32
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-32
Abstract
Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes traditionally uses mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD; mean difference in pooled standard deviation (SD) units). We recently used an alternative ratio of mean values (RoM) method, calculating RoM for each study and estimating its variance by the delta method. SMD and RoM allow pooling of outcomes expressed in different units and comparisons of effect sizes across interventions, but RoM interpretation does not require knowledge of the pooled SD, a quantity generally unknown to clinicians.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- Effect of nitric oxide on oxygenation and mortality in acute lung injury: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2007
- Meta-Analysis: Low-Dose Dopamine Increases Urine Output but Does Not Prevent Renal Dysfunction or DeathAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- Estimating the mean effect size in meta-analysis: Bias, precision, and mean squared error of different weighting methodsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 2003
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Effect Measures for Meta‒Analysis of Trials with Binary OutcomesPublished by Wiley ,2001
- Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐AnalysisPublished by Wiley ,2001
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986