Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies
Top Cited Papers
- 9 May 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 22 (1), 85-93
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.122
Abstract
The study of measurement error, observer variation and agreement between different methods of measurement are frequent topics in the imaging literature. We describe the problems of some applications of correlation and regression methods to these studies, using recent examples from this literature. We use a simulated example to show how these problems and misinterpretations arise. We describe the 95% limits of agreement approach and a similar, appropriate, regression technique. We discuss the difference vs. mean plot, and the pitfalls of plotting difference against one variable only. We stress that these are questions of estimation, not significance tests, and show how confidence intervals can be found for these estimates.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cervical length at 22–24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal‐translabial ultrasonographyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Fetal weight estimation by three‐dimensional ultrasoundUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Serial fetal lung volume measurement using three‐dimensional ultrasoundUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Pulmonary Emphysema: Subjective Visual Grading versus Objective Quantification with Macroscopic Morphometry and Thin-Section CT DensitometryRadiology, 1999
- Statistics Notes: Measurement error and correlation coefficientsBMJ, 1996
- Single X-ray absorptiometry: Performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometryOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Statistics Notes: Some examples of regression towards the meanBMJ, 1994
- Statistic Notes: Regression towards the meanBMJ, 1994
- Effects on birth weight of smoking, alcohol, caffeine, socioeconomic factors, and psychosocial stress.BMJ, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986