Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 29 September 2011
- journal article
- practice guideline
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 103 (22), 1656-1664
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr393
Abstract
Uncontrolled proliferation is a hallmark of cancer. In breast cancer, immunohistochemical assessment of the proportion of cells staining for the nuclear antigen Ki67 has become the most widely used method for comparing proliferation between tumor samples. Potential uses include prognosis, prediction of relative responsiveness or resistance to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, estimation of residual risk in patients on standard therapy and as a dynamic biomarker of treatment efficacy in samples taken before, during, and after neoadjuvant therapy, particularly neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. Increasingly, Ki67 is measured in these scenarios for clinical research, including as a primary efficacy endpoint for clinical trials, and sometimes for clinical management. At present, the enormous variation in analytical practice markedly limits the value of Ki67 in each of these contexts. On March 12, 2010, an international panel of investigators with substantial expertise in the assessment of Ki67 and in the development of biomarker guidelines was convened in London by the cochairs of the Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group Biomarker Working Party to consider evidence for potential applications. Comprehensive recommendations on preanalytical and analytical assessment, and interpretation and scoring of Ki67 were formulated based on current evidence. These recommendations are geared toward achieving a harmonized methodology, create greater between-laboratory and between-study comparability, and allow earlier valid applications of this marker in clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative assessment shows loss of antigenic epitopes as a function of pre-analytic variablesLaboratory Investigation, 2011
- Which patients benefit most from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors? Results using a composite measure of prognostic risk in the BIG 1-98 randomized trialAnnals of Oncology, 2011
- Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potentialThe Lancet Oncology, 2010
- Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Improved Surgical Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Results from a Multicenter Phase II TrialJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2009
- Outcome Prediction for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Based on Postneoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Tumor CharacteristicsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Predictive Value of Tumor Ki-67 Expression in Two Randomized Trials of Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Node-Negative Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Long-term preservation of antigenicity on tissue microarraysLaboratory Investigation, 2004
- Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002