A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 84 (5), 1401-1405
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.053
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Poor responders: does the protocol make a difference?Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Clinical and Endocrine Effects of a Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare Regimen Administered to Poor Responders Who Are Undergoing In Vitro FertilizationFertility and Sterility, 1998
- Use of the flare-up protocol with high dose human follicle stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization in poor respondersFertility and Sterility, 1996
- Minidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is the treatment of choice in poor responders with high follicle-stimulating hormone levelsFertility and Sterility, 1994
- The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsFertility and Sterility, 1992
- A prospective randomized comparison of luteal phase versus concurrent follicular phase initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilizationFertility and Sterility, 1992
- Routine pituitary suppression with leuprolide before ovarian stimulation for oocyte retrievalFertility and Sterility, 1989
- Follicular atresia associated with concurrent initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and follicle-stimulating hormone for oocyte recruitmentFertility and Sterility, 1988
- Outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with low response to ovarian stimulationFertility and Sterility, 1987
- The Ovarian Androgen Producing Cells: A Review of Structure/Function Relationships1,2Endocrine Reviews, 1985