Methods of adjustment for estimating the attributable risk in case‐control studies: A review
- 1 November 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 10 (11), 1753-1773
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780101113
Abstract
In the 1980's, progress was made in adjusting estimates of the attributable risk (AR) for confounding factors and in calculating associated confidence intervals. In this paper, methods of adjustment for estimation of the AR in case‐control studies are reviewed. The limitations and problems associated with two methods based on stratification, the weighted‐sum approach and the Mantel‐Haenszel approach, are discussed. They include small‐sample bias with the weighted‐sum approach and the difficulty of taking interaction into account with the Mantel‐Haenszel approach. A third method based on logistic regression is reviewed. It is argued that this latter method has the greatest generality and flexibility, and includes the two other approaches as special cases. Throughout the paper, an example of a case‐control study of oesophageal cancer illustrates the use of the methods described.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Delta Method for Implicitly Defined Random VariablesThe American Statistician, 1989
- Summary attributable risk estimation from unmatched case‐control dataStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- Variance estimators for attributable fraction estimates consistent in both large strata and sparse dataStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- A method for using epidemiologic data to estimate the potential impact of an intervention on the health status of a target populationJournal of Community Health, 1982
- Statistical methods for estimating attributable risk from retrospective dataStatistics in Medicine, 1982
- Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparseBiometrika, 1981
- Estimation of Attributable Risk in the Presence of ConfoundingBiometrical Journal, 1979