SMART retransmission: performance with overload and random losses
- 23 November 2002
- proceedings article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Vol. 3, 1131-1138
- https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.1997.631134
Abstract
Feedback flow control, in conjunction with limited buffering in the network, inevitably leads to packet loss. Effective congestion control requires not only effective flow control but also a good retransmission strategy. We present a new retransmission strategy called SMART that combines the best features of the traditional go-back-n and selective-retransmit strategies.We show, first, that go-back-n retransmission with static window flow control leads to congestion collapse when the nominal load exceeds the link capacity. Second, we can avert congestion collapse by replacing go-back-n with SMART retransmission, even with static window flow control. Third, SMART retransmission, when combined with Packet-Pair rate-based flow control, performs extremely well, both when losses are due to buffer overflows and when losses are random.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design, implementation, and performance of a native mode ATM transport layerPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- Forward acknowledgementACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 1996
- Simulation-based comparisons of Tahoe, Reno and SACK TCPACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 1996
- TCP Vegas: end to end congestion avoidance on a global InternetIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1995
- Error and flow control performance of a high speed protocolIEEE Transactions on Communications, 1993
- A control-theoretic approach to flow controlPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1991
- Why TCP timers don't work wellPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1986