Everolimus for the Prevention of Allograft Rejection and Vasculopathy in Cardiac-Transplant Recipients
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 August 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (9), 847-858
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022171
Abstract
Everolimus, a novel proliferation inhibitor and immunosuppressive agent, may suppress cardiac-allograft vasculopathy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing everolimus with azathioprine in recipients of a first heart transplant. A total of 634 patients were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg of everolimus per day (209 patients), 3.0 mg of everolimus per day (211 patients), or 1.0 to 3.0 mg of azathioprine per kilogram of body weight per day (214 patients), in combination with cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and statins. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, graft loss or retransplantation, loss to follow-up, biopsy-proved acute rejection of grade 3A, or rejection with hemodynamic compromise. At six months, the percentage of patients who had reached the primary efficacy end point was significantly smaller in the group given 3.0 mg of everolimus (27.0 percent, P<0.001) and the group given 1.5 mg of everolimus (36.4 percent, P=0.03) than in the azathioprine group (46.7 percent). Intravascular ultrasonography showed that the average increase in maximal intimal thickness 12 months after transplantation was significantly smaller in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. The incidence of vasculopathy was also significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (35.7 percent, P=0.045) and the 3.0-mg group (30.4 percent, P=0.01) than in the azathioprine group (52.8 percent). The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (7.7 percent, P<0.001) and the 3.0-mg group (7.6 percent, P<0.001) than in the azathioprine group (21.5 percent). Rates of bacterial infection were significantly higher in the 3.0-mg group than in the azathioprine group. Serum creatinine levels were also significantly higher in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. Everolimus was more efficacious than azathioprine in reducing the severity and incidence of cardiac-allograft vasculopathy, suggesting that everolimus therapy may alleviate this serious problem.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cellular rejection and rate of progression of transplant vasculopathy: a 3-year serial intravascular ultrasound studyThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2001
- INCIDENCE, PROGRESSION AND FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY AFTER HEART TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 2000
- Impact of intravascular ultrasound in understanding transplant coronary artery diseaseCurrent Opinion in Cardiology, 1999
- Development of Transplantation Vasculopathy and Progression of Donor-Transmitted AtherosclerosisCirculation, 1998
- Noninvasive assessment of transplant-associated arteriosclerosisAmerican Heart Journal, 1998
- Mammalian target of rapamycin: immunosuppressive drugs uncover a novel pathway of cytokine receptor signalingCurrent Opinion in Immunology, 1998
- Prognostic Importance of Intimal Thickness as Measured by Intracoronary Ultrasound After Cardiac TransplantationCirculation, 1995
- Rapamune (Sirolimus, Rapamycin): An Overview and Mechanism of ActionTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1995
- Chronic graft rejectionCurrent Opinion in Immunology, 1994
- Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with cardiac allograft rejection and atherosclerosisJAMA, 1989