Involvement of Adenosine A1 and A2A Receptors in the Adenosinergic Modulation of the Discriminative-Stimulus Effects of Cocaine and Methamphetamine in Rats
- 13 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET) in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Vol. 307 (3), 977-986
- https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.056762
Abstract
Adenosine, by acting on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, is known to antagonistically modulate dopaminergic neurotransmission. We have recently reported that nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists (caffeine and 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine) can partially substitute for the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine. In the present study, by using more selective compounds, we investigated the involvement of A1 and A2A receptors in the adenosinergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of both cocaine and methamphetamine. The effects of the A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA; 0.01–0.1 mg/kg) and antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT; 1.3–23.7 mg/kg) and the A2A receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS 21680; 0.03–0.18 mg/kg) and antagonist 3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-(3-methoxystyryl)-7-methyl-1-propargylxanthin phosphate disodium salt (MSX-3; 1–56 mg/kg) were evaluated in rats trained to discriminate either 1 mg/kg methamphetamine or 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food presentation. The A1 and A2A receptor antagonists (CPT and MSX-3) both produced high levels of drug-lever selection when substituted for either methamphetamine or cocaine and significantly shifted dose-response curves of both psychostimulants to the left. Unexpectedly, the A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 also produced drug-appropriate responding (although at lower levels) when substituted for the cocaine-training stimulus, and both CGS 21680 and the A1 receptor agonist CPA significantly shifted the cocaine dose-response curve to the left. In contrast, both agonists did not produce significant levels of drug-lever selection when substituted for the methamphetamine-training stimulus and failed to shift the methamphetamine dose-response curve. Therefore, adenosine A1 and A2A receptors appear to play important but differential roles in the modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peripheral blood film of a young male who presented with persecutory delusions and suicidal behavior, showing numerous acanthocytesMolecular Psychiatry, 2007
- Involvement of Adenosine A1 and A2A Receptors in the Motor Effects of Caffeine after its Acute and Chronic AdministrationNeuropsychopharmacology, 2003
- Coaggregation, Cointernalization, and Codesensitization of Adenosine A2A Receptors and Dopamine D2ReceptorsJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2002
- Species differences in brain adenosine A1 receptor pharmacology revealed by use of xanthine and pyrazolopyridine based antagonistsBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1997
- Adenosine–dopamine receptor–receptor interactions as an integrative mechanism in the basal gangliaTrends in Neurosciences, 1997
- Adenosine A2A Agonists: A Potential New Type of Atypical AntipsychoticNeuropsychopharmacology, 1997
- 8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine and Other Xanthines Differentially Bind to the Wild-Type and ΔF508 Mutant First Nucleotide Binding Fold (NBF-1) Domains of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorBiochemistry, 1997
- Cystic fibrosis mRNA expression in rat brainNeuroReport, 1997
- Stimulation by Alkylxanthines of Chloride Efflux in CFPAC-1 Cells Does Not Involve A1 Adenosine ReceptorsBiochemistry, 1995
- Modulation of striatal adenosine A1 and A2 receptors induces rotational behaviour in response to dopaminergic stimulation in intact ratsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1994