A prospective controlled trial of st. jude versus starr edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 76 (1), 66-73
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00118-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The St. Jude Medical prosthesisThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1994
- Twelve years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- St. Jude prosthesis for aortic and mitral valve replacement: A ten-year experienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- St. Jude medical prosthesis: Another 10-year follow-up reportThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prosthesesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1993
- A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or BioprosthesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: An in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valvesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Twelve-Year Comparison of a Bjork–Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve with Porcine BioprosthesesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Which heart valves should we use?The Lancet, 1990
- Primary isolated aortic valve replacementThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989