Prognostic determinants of acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: Impact on clinical trial design
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 33 (Supplement), S217-S222
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000155788.39101.7e
Abstract
The objective of this study was to review known clinical predictors and biologic markers of adverse clinical outcomes in acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that might be used as selection criteria in clinical trials of novel therapies for ALI/ARDS. Published studies on clinical predictors and biologic markers of adverse outcomes in ALI/ARDS. In large epidemiologic studies, a number of clinical factors have been identified consistently as independent predictors of mortality in ALI/ARDS. These include age, comorbidities, including chronic liver disease and immunosuppression, severity of illness scores, and the degree of multisystem organ failure. Several biologic markers of mortality have also been identified in large studies, including von Willebrand factor antigen, surfactant protein D, protein C, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, interleukins 6 and 8, and the TNF receptors. The Pao2/Fio2 ratio at the onset of ALI/ARDS does not predict clinical outcome but may be more useful after the first day of ALI/ARDS. A persistently low Pao2/Fio2 ratio is associated with worse outcomes and may be a marker of failure to respond to conventional therapy. Changes in IL-6, IL-8, TNF receptors, and SP-D over the first 3 days of ALI/ARDS are also associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The use of a combination of clinical factors and biologic markers is a promising strategy that needs to be prospectively validated. The design of clinical trials for new therapies for ALI and ARDS is a complex problem that ultimately will have a major impact on both trial outcome and generalizability. A number of clinical factors and biologic markers can be used to differentiate groups of patients at highest risk for adverse clinical outcomes. Whether enriching study populations with these sicker patients will increase or decrease the likelihood of a treatment effect for a given therapy is unknown.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care unitsIntensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Incidence of acute lung injury in the United States*Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Epidemiology and outcome of acute respiratory failure in intensive care unit patientsCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Pulmonary Dead-Space Fraction as a Risk Factor for Death in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Reduced mortality in association with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)Thorax, 1998
- Health-related quality of life and posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Identification of patients with acute lung injury. Predictors of mortality.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994