Difference in time to positivity of hub-blood versus nonhub-blood cultures is not useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 29 (7), 1399-1403
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200107000-00016
Abstract
The differential time to positivity (DTTP), defined as the difference in time necessary for the blood cultures taken by a peripheral puncture and through the catheter to become positive has been suggested to be useful in differentiating between catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) and other sources of bacteremia. A DTTP of >120 mins was found predominantly in CR-BSI. The objective of our study was to investigate whether DTTP is useful for the diagnosis of CR-BSI in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. Prospective clinical study. A 60-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. One hundred consecutive adult patients from whom catheter(s) were to be removed for suspected CR-BSI were studied. A blood culture (using aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles) was first taken from a new puncture site. Next, a blood culture was taken through every intravascular catheter in place. DTTP was calculated using the automated BacT/Alert blood culture system. Three patients had CR-BSI and nine patients had noncatheter-related bacteremia. Five patients had catheter-related sepsis without proven bacteremia. There was no significant difference in median DTTP between patients with CR-BSI and noncatheter-related bacteremia (2.1 hrs and 3.3 hrs, respectively;p = .6). Moreover, catheter-related sepsis in patients without bacteremia could not be detected using DTTP. DTTP seems not to be useful for the diagnosis of CR-BSI in a medical-surgical intensive care unit.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood culturesThe Lancet, 1999
- Differential Quantitative Blood Cultures in the Diagnosis of Catheter‐Related Sepsis in Intensive Care UnitsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Infectious Complications of Indwelling Vascular CathetersClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsisEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Prospective study of infections in indwelling central venous catheters using quantitative blood culturesThe American Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Bacteraemia related to indwelling central venous catheters: Prevention, diagnosis and treatmentEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Diagnosis of Central Venous Catheter-Related SepsisArchives of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Quantitative blood cultures in the evaluation of septicemia in children with Broviac cathetersThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1984
- Total parenteral nutrition-related infectionsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Catheter Complications in Total Parenteral NutritionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974