Comparative field study: impact of laboratory assay variability on the assessment of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity
- 1 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 112 (11), 932-940
- https://doi.org/10.1160/th13-11-0971
Abstract
Due to variability in the one-stage clotting assay, the performance of new factor IX (FIX) products should be assessed in this assay. The objective of this field study was to evaluate the accuracy of measuring recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity in clinical haemostasis laboratories using the one-stage clotting assay. Human haemophilic donor plasma was spiked with rFIXFc or BeneFIX® at 0.80, 0.20, or 0.05 IU/ml based on label potency. Laboratories tested blinded samples using their routine one-stage assay and in-house FIX plasma standard. The mean spike recoveries for BeneFIX (n=30 laboratories) were 121 %, 144 %, and 168 % of expected at nominal 0.80, 0.20, and 0.05 IU/ml concentrations, respectively. Corresponding rFIXFc spike recoveries were 88 %, 107 %, and 132 % of expected, respectively. All BeneFIX concentrations were consistently overestimated by most laboratories. rFIXFc activity was reagent-dependent; ellagic acid and silica gave higher values than kaolin, which underestimated rFIXFc. BeneFIX demonstrated significantly reduced chromogenic assay activity relative to one-stage assay results and nominal activity, while rFIXFc activity was close to nominal activity at three concentrations with better dilution linearity than the typical one-stage assay. In conclusion, laboratory- and reagent-specific assay variabilities were revealed, with progressively higher variability at lower FIX concentrations. Non-parallelism against the FIX plasma standard was observed in all one-stage assays with rFIXFc and BeneFIX, leading to significant overestimation of FIX activity at lower levels and generally high inter-laboratory variability. Compared to the accuracy currently achieved in clinical laboratories when measuring other rFIX products, most laboratories measured rFIXFc activity with acceptable accuracy and reliability using routine one-stage assay methods and commercially available plasma standards.Keywords
Funding Information
- Biogen Idec
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Head-to-head comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of a high-purity factor IX concentrate (AlphaNine®) and a recombinant factor IX (BeneFIX®) in patients with severe haemophilia BHaemophilia, 2013
- Guidelines for the management of hemophiliaHaemophilia, 2012
- International comparative field study of N8 evaluating factor VIII assay performanceHaemophilia, 2011
- Treatment of hemophilia: a review of current advances and ongoing issuesJournal of Blood Medicine, 2010
- International reference standards in coagulationBiologicals, 2010
- Laboratory Assays in HemophiliaPublished by Wiley ,2010
- Insights from factor IX activation studies with chromogenic assays: implications of disparate product resultsHaemophilia, 2010
- Receptor-Fc fusion therapeutics, traps, and MIMETIBODY™ technologyCurrent Opinion in Biotechnology, 2009
- FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of ageNature Reviews Immunology, 2007
- Collaborative field study on the utility of a BDD factor VIII concentrate standard in the estimation of BDDr Factor VIII:C activity in hemophilic plasma using one-stage clotting assaysJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2004