Effect of Ventricular Shock Strength on Cardiac Hemodynamics
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 9 (8), 791-797
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00118.x
Abstract
Ventricular Defibrillation and Cardiac Function. Introduction: The effect of implantable defibrillator shocks on cardiac hemodynamics is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that ventricular defibrillator shocks adversely effect cardiac hemodynamics. Methods and Results: The cardiac index was determined by calculating the mitral valve inflow with transesophogeal Doppler during nonthoracotomy defibrillator implantation in 17 patients. The cardiac index was determined before, and immediately, 1 minute, 2 minutes, and 4 minutes after shocks were delivered during defibrillation energy requirement testing with 27‐ to 34‐, 15‐, 10‐, 5‐, 3‐, or 1‐J shocks. The cardiac Index was also measured at the same time points after 27‐ to 34‐, and 1‐J shocks delivered during the baseline rhythm. The cardiac index decreased from 2.30 ± 0.40 L/min per m2 before a 27‐ to 34‐J shock during defibrillation energy requirement testing to 2.14 ± 0.45 L/min per m2 immediately afterwards (P= 0.001). This effect persisted for >4 minutes. An adverse hemodynamic effect of similar magnitude occurred after 15 J (P= 0.003) and 10‐J shocks (P= 0.01), but dissipated after 4 minutes and within 2 minutes, respectively. There was a significant correlation between shock strength and the percent change in cardiac index (r = 0.3, P= 0.03). The cardiac index decreased 14% after a 27‐ to 34‐J shock during the baseline rhythm (P < 0.0001). This effect persisted for Conclusion: Defibrillator shocks >9 J delivered during the baseline rhythm or during defibrillation energy requirement testing result in a 10% to 15% reduction in cardiac index, whereas smaller energy shocks do not affect cardiac hemodynamics. The duration and extent of the adverse effect are proportional to the shock strength. Shock strength, and not ventricular fibrillation, appears to be most responsible for This effect. Therefore, the detrimental hemodynamic effects of high‐energy shocks may be avoided when low‐energy defibrillation is used.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Output Is Not Affected During Intraoperative Testing of the Automatic Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1996
- Hemodynamic deterioration during ICD implant: Predictors of high-risk patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Initial Experience with Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead Systems: Operative Morbidity and MortalityPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Cardiopulmonary effects of internal cardioverter/defibrillator implantationActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1991
- Effects of electrophysiologic testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on left ventricular systolic function and diastolic fillingAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Effects of electrophysiologic studies resulting in electrical countershock or burst pacing on left ventricular systolic and diastolic functionAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Effect of Electrophysiological Testing on Ejection Fraction During Cardioverter/Defibrillator ImplantationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window.Circulation, 1984
- Effect of direct-current countershocks on regional myocardial contractility and perfusion. Experimental studies.Circulation, 1981
- Effects of DC Electric Countershock on Ventricular Function, Cation Balance and Endogenous Norepinephrine in the Dog HeartCardiology, 1974