Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: A blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 179 (4), 852-857
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70177-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm deliveryUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Can a “snapshot” sagittal view of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography predict active preterm labor?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- The Length of the Cervix and the Risk of Spontaneous Premature DeliveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Correlation Between Transperineal Sonography and Digital Examination in the Evaluation of the Third-Trimester CervixObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Commentary: Changes to our health service. Is there a cost to the infertile patient? A survey of general practitionersJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Transperineal sonography in second trimester to term pregnancy and early labor.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1991
- Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with digital examination.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1990
- Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical lengthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990
- Risk scoring for preterm labor: Where do we go from here?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987