Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 41 (10), 1002-1009
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02844.x
Abstract
This study aimed to establish documentation standards for medical education activities, beyond educational research, for academic promotion consistent with principles of excellence and scholarship. In 2006 a Consensus Conference on Educational Scholarship was convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Group on Education Affairs (GEA) to outline a set of documentation standards for use by educators and academic promotion committees. Conference participants' work was informed by more than 15 years of literature on scholarship, educator portfolios and academic promotion standards. The 110 conference participants, including medical school deans, academic promotion committee members, department chairs, faculty and AAMC leaders, re-affirmed the 5 education activity categories (teaching, curriculum, advising and/or mentoring, education leadership and/or administration, and learner assessment), the contents of each category, and cross-category documentation standards. Educational excellence requires documentation of the quantity and quality of education activities. Documenting a scholarly approach requires demonstrating evidence of drawing from and building on the work of others, and documenting scholarship requires contributing work through public display, peer review and dissemination; both involve engagement with the community of educators. Implementation of these standards - quantity, quality and engagement with the education community - should occur in parallel with the development of an infrastructure to support educators, including sustained faculty development for educators, access to educational resources and journals, peer review mechanisms and consultation and support specific to each activity category. Educators' contributions to their institutions must be visible to be valued. The establishment of documentation standards for education activities provides the foundation for academic recognition of educators.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Educational scholarship as a route to academic promotion: a depiction of surgical education scholarsThe American Journal of Surgery, 2006
- The qualities of a good teacher: how can they be acquired and sustained?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2005
- The Academy Movement: A Structural Approach to Reinvigorating the Educational MissionAcademic Medicine, 2004
- Documentation Systems for Educators Seeking Academic Promotion in U.S. Medical SchoolsAcademic Medicine, 2004
- Expectations of and for Clerkship Directors: A Collaborative Statement from the Alliance for Clinical EducationTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2003
- The Medical Schoolʼs Faculty Is Its Most Important AssetAcademic Medicine, 2003
- Identifying characteristics that students, interns and residents look for in their role modelsMedical Education, 2001
- Faculty development, teacher training and teacher accreditation in medical education: twenty years from nowMedical Teacher, 2000
- Making a case for the teaching scholarAcademic Medicine, 1999
- Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada. A survey of promotion committee chairpersonsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997