Meat, Fish, and Colorectal Cancer Risk: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 97 (12), 906-916
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji164
Abstract
Background: Current evidence suggests that high red meat intake is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. High fish intake may be associated with a decreased risk, but the existing evidence is less convincing. Methods: We prospectively followed 478 040 men and women from 10 European countries who were free of cancer at enrollment between 1992 and 1998. Information on diet and lifestyle was collected at baseline. After a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 1329 incident colorectal cancers were documented. We examined the relationship between intakes of red and processed meat, poultry, and fish and colorectal cancer risk using a proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, energy (nonfat and fat sources), height, weight, work-related physical activity, smoking status, dietary fiber and folate, and alcohol consumption, stratified by center. A calibration substudy based on 36 994 subjects was used to correct hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diet measurement errors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Colorectal cancer risk was positively associated with intake of red and processed meat (highest [>160 g/day] versus lowest [80 g/day versus Ptrend <.001), but was not related to poultry intake. Correcting for measurement error strengthened the associations between colorectal cancer and red and processed meat intake (per 100-g increase HR = 1.25, 95% CI =1.09 to 1.41, Ptrend = .001 and HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.02, Ptrend = .001 before and after calibration, respectively) and for fish (per 100 g increase HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.87, Ptrend <.001 and HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.77, Ptrend = .003; before and after correction, respectively). In this study population, the absolute risk of development of colorectal cancer within 10 years for a study subject aged 50 years was 1.71% for the highest category of red and processed meat intake and 1.28% for the lowest category of intake and was 1.86% for subjects in the lowest category of fish intake and 1.28% for subjects in the highest category of fish intake. Conclusions: Our data confirm that colorectal cancer risk is positively associated with high consumption of red and processed meat and support an inverse association with fish intake.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Red meat consumption and risk of cancers of the proximal colon, distal colon and rectum: The Swedish Mammography CohortInternational Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Adjusting for energy intake--what measure to use in nutritional epidemiological studies?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Diet and cancer — the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and NutritionNature Reviews Cancer, 2004
- Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Meat, Fat, and Their Subtypes as Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer in a Prospective Cohort of WomenAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- TWO STUDIES FIND HIGH-FIBER DIET LOWERS COLON CANCER RISKCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003
- Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)Public Health Nutrition, 2002
- Meat consumption in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorts: results from 24-hour dietary recallsPublic Health Nutrition, 2002
- Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: The New York university women's health studyNutrition and Cancer, 1997
- Sugar, meat, and fat intake, and non-dietary risk factors for colon cancer incidence in Iowa women (United States)Cancer Causes & Control, 1994