A survey of proof theory
- 10 October 1968
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Symbolic Logic
- Vol. 33 (3), 321-388
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2270324
Abstract
One might fairly say that the very meaning of our subject has changed since Hilbert introduced it under the name Beweistheorie (it was meant to be the principal tool for formulating Hubert's general conception of how to analyze mathematical reasoning). Specifically, the roles of the two principal elements of proof theory, namely the intuitive proofs accepted and the formal proofs (or derivations) studied, have turned out to be quite different from what Hilbert thought. In his view the hard work had been done in the discovery of formalization, and what remained was the study of certain given formal systems.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systems of predicative analysis, II: Representations of ordinalsThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1968
- Reflection Principles and their Use for Establishing the Complexity of Axiomatic SystemsMathematical Logic Quarterly, 1968
- An extension of Schütte's KlammersymbolsMathematische Annalen, 1967
- A hierarchy of formulas in set theoryMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 1965
- Systems of predicative analysisThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1964
- The separation theorem of intuitionist propositional calculusThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1962
- 1 — Consistency and faithful interpretationsArchive for Mathematical Logic, 1962
- Number theoretic concepts and recursive well-orderingsArchive for Mathematical Logic, 1960
- On the Interpretation of Non-Finitist Proofs--Part IThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1951
- Untersuchungen ber das logische Schlie en. IMathematische Zeitschrift, 1935