The Energy for Ventricular Defibrillation — Too Little or Too Much?
- 1 June 1978
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 298 (22), 1252-1253
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197806012982209
Abstract
The introduction of direct-current discharge defibrillation into clinical use1 has provided a high yield of resuscitations and has gained universal acceptance. It seemed until recently that this starkly simple electronic device would withstand the onslaught of technologic innovation and inevitable obsolescence. Although the technic is not being challenged, under question is the adequacy of energy being provided by present-day instruments.2 3 4 The general thesis being espoused by the proponents of an energy-dose concept is that body weight is an important determinant of defibrillation energy requirements and that apparatus in current use are inadequate for heavy subjects. This is an issue of . . .Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Energy requirement for defibrillation of a markedly overweight patient.Circulation, 1978
- Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in adults.BMJ, 1977
- Myocsrdial uptake of technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate following direct current transthoracic countershock.Circulation, 1976
- Transchest electrical ventricular defibrillationAmerican Heart Journal, 1976
- Energy Dosage for Human Trans-Chest Electrical Ventricular DefibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974
- Electrical Dose for Ventricular Defibrillation of Large and Small Animals Using Precordial ElectrodesJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1974
- Myocardial Infarction with Ventricular Fibrillation during Pregnancy Treated by Direct Current Defibrillation with Fetal SurvivalChest, 1970
- A Vulnerable Period for Ventricular Tachycardia Following Myocardial InfarctionCardiovascular Research, 1968
- Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias.Heart, 1967
- Clinical SciencePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1962