Authorship: “Law” and Order
Open Access
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 6 (4), 297-301
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00393.x
Abstract
Publication is a marker of academic success. In academia, appointments and promotions are in many cases strongly linked to the candidate's bibliography. The “publish or perish” mindset has placed extraordinary pressures on scientists and academic physicians alike. Authorship controversies have received considerable attention in the medical literature. Although guidelines are available to help determine how attribution should be acknowledged, anecdotal experiences with disputes associated with authorship continue to exist. This paper addresses several key problems facing authorship. A discussion of who should be given authorship, the responsibilities of an author, and a method for assigning authorship in a multiauthored publication is provided.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multiple authorship revisited: How much is enough?The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1998
- When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountableJAMA, 1997
- Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical JournalsJAMA, 1997
- Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal EditorsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- On Authorship and AcknowledgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The Order of Authorship: Who's on First?JAMA, 1990
- The order of authorship: who's on first?JAMA, 1990
- Trends, truth, and consequences in the emergency medicine literatureThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1988
- Who should be an author?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- The Weight of Medical KnowledgeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978