Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
- 19 January 2009
- Vol. 338 (jan19 1), a3152
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3152
Abstract
In 2005 we published draft guidelines for reporting studies of quality improvement, as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE). This narrative progress report summarises the special features of improvement that are reflected in SQUIRE, and describes major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft guidelines. It also briefly describes the guideline development process; considers the limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; describes ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development; and discusses plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care researchJournal of Applied Oral Science, 2011
- The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaborationQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2008
- The checklist: if something so simple can transform intensive care, what else can it do?2007
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- A Next Step: Reviewer Feedback on Quality Improvement Publication GuidelinesThe Permanente Journal, 2007
- Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- Broadening the view of evidence-based medicineQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readersPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995