Privacy and Limited Democracy: The Moral Centrality of Persons
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Philosophy and Policy
- Vol. 17 (2), 120-140
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500002132
Abstract
Of all the moral concerns regarding privacy in its various meanings, this essay selects only one: the right to be left alone by others, in particular, by government. Because moral controversies in pluralist societies tend to be interminable, and surely controversies regarding privacy are no exception, I approach the right to privacy in terms of the centrality of persons. When there are foundational disputes about which content-full moral view should govern, it is not possible to resolve such controversies without begging the question or conceding at the outset crucial moral premises. This observation is not to affirm a moral skepticism or relativism. At worst, it involves an epistemic skepticism, a skepticism about the possibility of resolving controversies by sound rational argument without begging the question or engaging in an infinite regress.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concealment and ExposurePhilosophy & Public Affairs, 1998
- Managed Care, Medical Privacy, and the Paradigm of ConsentKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1997
- Digital People, Digital Places: Rethinking Privacy in a World of Geographic InformationEthics & Behavior, 1997
- Corporate Appropriation of Privacy: The Transformation of the Personal and Public SpheresEthics & Behavior, 1997
- The Idea of Public Reason RevisitedThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1997
- The genetics revolution, economics, ethics, and insurance.Journal of Business Ethics, 1997
- Personal Rights and Public SpacePhilosophy & Public Affairs, 1995
- Contingency, Irony, and SolidarityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Scientific ControversiesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1987
- The Right to PrivacyHarvard Law Review, 1890