Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
Top Cited Papers
- 15 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 357 (20), 2001-2015
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0706482
Abstract
Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine is a cornerstone of treatment to prevent thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. To compare prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, with clopidogrel, we randomly assigned 13,608 patients with moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention to receive prasugrel (a 60-mg loading dose and a 10-mg daily maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a 75-mg daily maintenance dose), for 6 to 15 months. The primary efficacy end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The key safety end point was major bleeding. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 12.1% of patients receiving clopidogrel and 9.9% of patients receiving prasugrel (hazard ratio for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.90; P<0.001). We also found significant reductions in the prasugrel group in the rates of myocardial infarction (9.7% for clopidogrel vs. 7.4% for prasugrel; P<0.001), urgent target-vessel revascularization (3.7% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001), and stent thrombosis (2.4% vs. 1.1%; P<0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 2.4% of patients receiving prasugrel and in 1.8% of patients receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.68; P=0.03). Also greater in the prasugrel group was the rate of life-threatening bleeding (1.4% vs. 0.9%; P=0.01), including nonfatal bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio, 1.25; P=0.23) and fatal bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P=0.002). In patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal bleeding. Overall mortality did not differ significantly between treatment groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097591.)Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Platelet Reactivity After Clopidogrel Administration on Drug-Eluting Stent ThrombosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Impact of the Degree of Peri-Interventional Platelet Inhibition After Loading With Clopidogrel on Early Clinical Outcome of Elective Coronary Stent PlacementJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Clopidogrel Effect on Platelet REactivity in Patients With Stent ThrombosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin and Fibrinolytic Therapy for Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment ElevationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individualsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Durability of platelet inhibition by clopidogrelThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- Short- and long-term oral antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Early and Sustained Dual Oral Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJAMA, 2002
- Effects of Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes without ST-Segment ElevationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001