Local drug delivery: Impact of pressure, substance characteristics, and stenting on drug transfer into the arterial wall
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 47 (1), 102-106
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199905)47:1<102::aid-ccd22>3.0.co;2-g
Abstract
Injection parameters for local drug delivery are frequently determined by studies with marker substances. However, the pharmacologic properties of the actual drug may influence delivery efficiency and lead to different results. Aim of this study was to assess the delivery capacities of two device‐drug combinations in order to verify this approach for further in vivo studies. Tritiated (3H) preparations (5 ml) of the hydrophylic low‐molecular‐weight heparin reviparin and the lipophilic taxane paclitaxel were injected into the left anterior descending artery of freshly explanted porcine hearts with the Infusasleeve II catheter system. A balloon support pressure of 6 atm and infusion pressures of 40, 60, 80, or 100 psi were used. In three additional groups, reviparin was injected following stent implantation and paclitaxel was injected prior to or following stent implantation. Arteries along with surrounding myocardium were harvested. The artery was carefully dissected, and artery and myocardium were separately homogenized, and activity was measured. Of the totally delivered activity, 0.09% ± 0.03% (40 psi) to 0.17% ± 0.13% (100 psi) of reviparin and 2.03% ± 0.67% (60 psi) to 2.68% ± 1.57% (100 psi) of paclitaxel were found in the vessel wall. The results for different injection pressures were not significantly different for either drug. The percentage activity delivered to the vessel wall was substantially larger in the paclitaxel group as compared to reviparin delivery (P < 0.01 at 60, 80, and 100 psi). The mean concentration of reviparin in the artery was 20 to 33 times higher than in the myocardium. For paclitaxel the factors were 110 to 243. Stent implantation prior to or following local delivery did not result in a different delivery efficiency. The results demonstrate that the characteristics of the delivered drug contribute largely to the delivery efficiency. Using identical injection parameters, drug concentrations in the arterial wall were significantly higher for the lipophilic paclitaxel as compared to the hydrophilic reviparin. Stenting of the artery did not influence delivery efficiency. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 47:102–106, 1999.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local drug delivery with porous balloons in the rabbit: Assessment of vascular injury for an improvement of application parametersCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1997
- Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent RestenosisCirculation, 1996
- Heparin delivery at the site of angioplasty with a nevel drug delivery sleeveThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Regional and arterial localization of radioactive microparticles after local delivery by unsupported or supported porous balloon cathetersAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Taxol inhibits neointimal smooth muscle cell accumulation after angioplasty in the rat.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1995
- 772-2 Local Intracoronary Delivery of Heparin and of a Somatostatin Analogue (Octreotide) Following Angioplasty in Man: Evaluation of Efficacy of Delivery by Radio-Isotopic TechniqueJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Prospects for site-specific delivery of pharmacologic and molecular therapiesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Local drug delivery cathetersCoronary Artery Disease, 1993
- Use of the perforated balloon catheter to infuse marker substances into diseased coronary artery walls after experimental postmortem angioplastyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Use of a perforated balloon catheter to deliver concentrated heparin into the wall of the normal canine arteryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990