A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes
- 30 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (11), 1169-1173
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteriaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical careBMJ, 2000
- Consensus Development Methods: A Review of Best Practice in Creating Clinical GuidelinesJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1999
- The American college of rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trialsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1993
- The Nominal Group Technique: A Research Tool for General Practice?Family Practice, 1993
- Quality and Acceptance of an Evaluative Task: The Effects of Four Group Decision-Making FormatsGroup & Organization Studies, 1984
- A COMPARISON OF DECISION QUALITY UNDER NOMINAL AND INTERACTING CONSENSUS GROUP FORMATS: THE CASE OF THE STRUCTURED PROBLEM*Decision Sciences, 1979
- A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program PlanningThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
- The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliographySocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1971
- An experimental study of group opinionFutures, 1969