Neurological morbidity of arch and carotid arteriography in cerebrovascular disease. The influence of contrast medium and radiologist

Abstract

A prospective study of 230 arch and carotid arteriograms in 229 patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular disease revealed that neurological morbidity was not significantly affected by patient age, nature of neurological symptoms, duration of procedure, volume of contrast medium or degree of arterial stenosis. The total neurological morbidity of 132 examinations carried out with non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) was slightly lower than that of 98 examinations carried out with ionic contrast medium (meglumine and sodium iothalamate) but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the morbidity of 185 examinations performed by an experienced vascular radiologist was significantly lower (p < 0.025) than the morbidity of 45 examinations performed by a series of radiologists in training and the mean time required for the procedure was 18 min longer in the latter group (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the neurological morbidity of arch and carotid arteriography in patients with cerebrovascular disease depends largely upon catheter technique and will not be significantly reduced by the use of non-ionic contrast medium.