Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Health Research
- Vol. 10 (3), 293-308
- https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118453
Abstract
In the literature on focus groups, far more attention has been devoted to how groups are organized and conducted than to issues of analysis. Although exploitation of group dynamics is touted as a virtue of focus groups, there is very little guidance in the literature with respect to how differences between group and individual discourse impact the analysis and interpretation of focus group data. In this article, the authors describe analytical challenges inherent in the interpretation of focus group data and suggest approaches for enhancing the rigor of analysis and the reliability and validity of focus group findings.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Focus Group Data and Qualitative Analysis Programs: Coding the Moving Picture as Well as the SnapshotsSociological Research Online, 1997
- Exploring the Atmosphere Created by Focus Group Interviews: Comparing Consumers' Feelings across Qualitative TechniquesMarket Research Society Journal, 1996
- Comment: Concerns in the Analysis of Focus Group DataQualitative Health Research, 1995
- IntroductionQualitative Health Research, 1995
- Focus Groups and EthnographyHuman Organization, 1995
- Capturing the Group Effect in Focus Groups: A Special Concern in AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 1994
- Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group DataEvaluation Review, 1992
- Issues of Reliability and ValidityPublished by SAGE Publications ,1991
- Focus Group Interview: An Underutilized Research Technique for Improving Theory and Practice in Health EducationHealth Education Quarterly, 1987
- Heuristic Heresy: Application of Reliability and Validity Criteria to Products of Grounded TheoryWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1986