Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Methods of Information in Medicine
- Vol. 37 (04/05), 394-403
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1634558
Abstract
Builders of medical informatics applications need controlled medical vocabularies to support their applications and it is to their advantage to use available standards. In order to do so, however, these standards need to address the requirements of their intended users. Overthe past decade, medical informatics researchers have begun to articulate some of these requirements. This paper brings together some of the common themes which have been described, including: vocabulary content, concept orientation, concept permanence, nonsemantic concept identifiers, polyhierarchy, formal definitions, rejection of “not elsewhere classified” terms, multiple granularities, mUltiple consistent views, context representation, graceful evolution, and recognized redundancy. Standards developers are beginning to recognize and address these desiderata and adapt their offerings to meet them.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward Data Standards for Clinical Nursing InformationJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- The Position of the Canon Group: A Reality CheckJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Controlled Medical Vocabulary Construction: Methods from the Canon GroupJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Interfacing a Stand-Alone Diagnostic Expert System with a Hospital Information SystemComputers and Biomedical Research, 1994
- Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuseComputers and Biomedical Research, 1992
- An interlingua for electronic interchange of medical information: Using frames to map between clinical vocabulariesComputers and Biomedical Research, 1991
- Of codes and keywordsAcademic Medicine, 1990
- Medicine and the Nature of Vertical ReasoningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- How Medical Professionals Evaluate Expressions of ProbabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Disease coding by computer. The "fruit machine" method.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1968