Diagnostic accuracy and cost‐effectiveness of dermoscopy in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial
- 7 November 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Vol. 28 (11), 1442-1449
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12306
Abstract
Background The dermoscope improves general practitioners' (GP) sensitivity for melanoma. However, diagnostic accuracy (DA) and cost‐effectiveness of the dermoscope in primary care for the evaluation of all skin lesions suspected of malignancy remains unknown. Objectives To determine the DA and cost‐effectiveness of the dermoscope in primary care for skin lesions suspected of malignancy. Methods In a cluster randomized clinical trial, 48 Dutch general practices were randomized to either intervention group using a dermoscope or control group using only naked‐eye examination. A total of 194 lesions from 170 patients in the intervention group and 222 lesions from 211 patients in the control group were analysed for DA and cost‐effectiveness. Results The percentage of correctly diagnosed lesions in intervention group and control group was 50.5% and 40.5% respectively. This was 61.5% and 22.2% for melanomas. In the intervention group, three malignancies were treated with the expectative treatment option compared to none in the control group. The odds ratio (OR) of a correct diagnosis in the intervention group, compared to control group, was 1.51 (95% CI: 0.96–2.37) P = 0.07. Consequently, the relative risk was 1.25. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was €89 (95% CI −€60 to €598), indicating that using a dermoscope costs an additional €89 for one additional correctly diagnosed patient. Additional analyses showed better effects of dermoscopy compared to the control group for 98% of the bootstrap resamples. Conclusions The probability of a correct diagnosis was 1.25 times higher using a dermoscope than without a dermoscope. Although this difference is marginally not statistically significant, dermoscopy in general practice appears to be cost effective. We therefore think that GPs should be trained to use a dermoscope, although they should realize that even with the use of a dermoscope not all lesions will be diagnosed correctly.Keywords
Funding Information
- Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMW
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic pigmented lesionsJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2011
- Increases in invasive melanoma in England, 1979–2006, by anatomical siteBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2011
- Incidence and Trends of Cutaneous Malignancies in the Netherlands, 1989–2005Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2010
- Impact of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging for the management of pigmented lesions in primary care: a sequential intervention trialBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2009
- Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical settingBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2008
- Skin cancer trends in Northern Ireland and consequences for provision of dermatology servicesBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2007
- Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin LesionsArchives of Dermatology, 2007
- Dermoscopy Improves Accuracy of Primary Care Physicians to Triage Lesions Suggestive of Skin CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Predictions of skin cancer incidence in the Netherlands up to 2015British Journal of Dermatology, 2005
- Three-Point Checklist of DermoscopyDermatology, 2004