A Comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot Circles Stereotests in Screening and Office Use
- 1 March 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 99 (3), 446-452
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010448011
Abstract
Research from JAMA Ophthalmology — A Comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot Circles Stereotests in Screening and Office UseThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Random-Dot-Stereogram Performance by Strabismic, Amblyopic, and Ocular-Pathology Patients in an Operant-Discrimination TaskOptometry and Vision Science, 1978
- Operant Conditioning and Assessment of Stereopsis in Young ChildrenOptometry and Vision Science, 1978
- Lateral Displacement as a Response Cue in the Titmus Stereo TestOptometry and Vision Science, 1977
- Refraction as a basis for screening children for squint and amblyopia.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1977
- Facilitation of Stereopsis from a Large Disparity Random-Dot Stereogram by Various Monocular Features: Further Findings (A Short Note)Perception, 1976
- Amblyopia Screening with Random-Dot StereogramsAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1975
- A New Stereoscopic Test for Amblyopia ScreeningAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1974
- A Reconsideration of Amblyopia Screening and StereopsisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1974
- Anomalous Stereoscopic Depth Perception*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971
- Stereopsis and stereoblindnessExperimental Brain Research, 1970