Pro–Prostate-Specific Antigen Measurements in Serum and Tissue Are Associated with Treatment Necessity among Men Enrolled in Expectant Management for Prostate Cancer
Open Access
- 30 November 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 15 (23), 7316-7321
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1263
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the association of quantitative clinical and pathologic information, including serum and tissue pro–prostate-specific antigen (proPSA) measurements, with outcomes among men with prostate cancer in an expectant management (active surveillance) program. Experimental Design: We identified 71 men enrolled in expectant management with frozen serum and tissue available from diagnosis: 39 subsequently developed unfavorable biopsies (Gleason score ≥7, ≥3 cores positive for cancer, >50% of any core involved with cancer), whereas 32 maintained favorable biopsies (median follow-up, 3.93 years). Serum total PSA, free PSA (fPSA), and [−2]proPSA were measured by the Beckman Coulter immunoassay. [−5/−7]proPSA was evaluated in cancer and benign-adjacent areas (BAA) by quantitative immunohistochemistry. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to identify significant associations with unfavorable biopsy conversion. Results: The ratio [−2]proPSA/% fPSA in serum was significantly higher at diagnosis (0.87 ± 0.44 versus 0.65 ± 0.36 pg/mL; P = 0.02) in men developing unfavorable biopsies. [−5/−7]proPSA tissue staining was more intense (4104.09 ± 3033.50 versus 2418.06 ± 1606.04; P = 0.03) and comprised a greater fractional area (11.58 ± 7.08% versus 6.88 ± 5.20%; P = 0.01) in BAA of these men. Serum [−2]proPSA/% fPSA [hazard ratio, 2.53 (1.18-5.41); P = 0.02], BAA [−5/−7]proPSA % area [hazard ratio, 1.06 (1.01-1.12); P = 0.02] and BAA [−5/−7]proPSA stain intensity [hazard ratio, 1.000213 (1.000071-1.000354); P = 0.003] were significantly associated with unfavorable biopsy in Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. Serum [−2]proPSA/% fPSA significantly correlated with BAA [−5/−7]proPSA % area (ρ = 0.40; P = 0.002) and BAA [−5/−7]proPSA stain intensity (ρ = 0.33; P = 0.016). Conclusions: In a prospective cohort of men enrolled into expectant management for prostate cancer, serum and tissue levels of proPSA at diagnosis are associated with need for subsequent treatment. The increase in serum proPSA/% fPSA might be driven by increased proPSA production from “premalignant” cells in the prostate BAA. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(23):7316–21)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gene Expression in Fixed Tissues and Outcome in Hepatocellular CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- A [‐2]proPSA‐based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseasesThe Prostate, 2008
- Biopsy tissue microarray study of Ki-67 expression in untreated, localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillanceProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2008
- [-2]Proenzyme Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection: A National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network Validation StudyJournal of Urology, 2008
- Radical Prostatectomy Versus Watchful Waiting in Localized Prostate Cancer: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 Randomized TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intentThe Prostate, 2007
- Somatic Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Prostate Cancer and Normal Appearing Adjacent Glands in Comparison to Age-Matched Prostate Samples without Malignant HistologyThe Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2006
- Pro PSA : a “pro cancer” form of PSA?Medical Hypotheses, 2005
- Can Prostate Specific Antigen Derivatives and Pathological Parameters Predict Significant Change in Expectant Management Criteria for Prostate Cancer?Journal of Urology, 2003