Sexual health interventions should be subject to experimental evaluation
- 6 February 2003
- book chapter
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract
This chapter argues that evaluating the effectiveness of sexual health promotion is necessary to promote the use of beneficial interventions, to prevent the deployment of harmful interventions, and to maximize the cost-effectiveness of programmes of sexual health promotion. Experimental evaluations of sexual health promotion should include process evaluations, and allocation may often be of clusters rather than individuals. Sexual health promotion interventions that are not amenable to experimental evaluation, because of political or practical problems, should not be totally ignored by researchers and policy-makers. Where experimental designs cannot be used, other evaluation methods must suffice.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- A cognitive behavioural intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections among gay men: randomised trialBMJ, 2001
- Randomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions: Figure 1:Journal of Medical Ethics, 2000
- Overview of study design in clinical epidemiologySexually Transmitted Infections, 2000
- What constitutes evidence in HIV/AIDS education?Health Education Research, 1999
- An epidemic of orthodoxy? Design and methodology in the evaluation of the effectiveness of HIV health promotionCritical Public Health, 1998
- Behavioural interventions for HIV/AIDS preventionAIDS, 1995
- Ethical issues in randomised prevention trials.BMJ, 1993
- Assessing AIDS prevention for injecting drug users; some methodological considerationsBritish Journal of Addiction, 1992
- An Evaluation of an Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program: Is "Just Say No" Enough?Family Relations, 1990
- Minimizing Harm and Maximizing Benefit During Innovation in Health Care: Controlled or Uncontrolled Experimentation?Birth, 1986