Regional Variation in Medical Care
- 31 August 1995
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 333 (9), 589-590
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199508313330911
Abstract
For more than 20 years, investigators have documented substantial variation in the use of medical and surgical procedures, hospital resources, and medications at both the regional and international levels.13 From this research we have learned that the type of medical care that patients receive may depend on where they live. More recently, investigators began to study another type of variation — variation in clinical outcomes such as mortality after cardiac surgery. Once again we have learned that there is substantial variation among regions, hospitals, and even individual physicians.4,5 At first the medical community greeted the reports with indifference . . .Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in the Use of Cardiac Procedures after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Regional Variation across the United States in the Management of Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- A Comparison of Management Patterns after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Canada and the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Geographic Variation in Expenditures for Physicians' Services in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study GroupJAMA, 1991
- Sex or survival: trade-offs between quality and quantity of life.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality ratesJAMA, 1990
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Small Area Variations in Health Care DeliveryScience, 1973
- A Comparison of Surgical Rates in Canada and in England and WalesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973