Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]
Top Cited Papers
- 8 May 2001
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 56 (9), 1133-1142
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.56.9.1133
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this project was to determine whether screening different groups of elderly individuals in a general or specialty practice would be beneficial in detecting dementia. Background: Epidemiologic studies of aging and dementia have demonstrated that the use of research criteria for the classification of dementia has yielded three groups of subjects: those who are demented, those who are not demented, and a third group of individuals who cannot be classified as normal or demented but who are cognitively (usually memory) impaired. Methods: The authors conducted computerized literature searches and generated a set of abstracts based on text and index words selected to reflect the key issues to be addressed. Articles were abstracted to determine whether there were sufficient data to recommend the screening of asymptomatic individuals. Other research studies were evaluated to determine whether there was value in identifying individuals who were memory-impaired beyond what one would expect for age but who were not demented. Finally, screening instruments and evaluation techniques for the identification of cognitive impairment were reviewed. Results: There were insufficient data to make any recommendations regarding cognitive screening of asymptomatic individuals. Persons with memory impairment who were not demented were characterized in the literature as having mild cognitive impairment. These subjects were at increased risk for developing dementia or AD when compared with similarly aged individuals in the general population. Recommendations: There were sufficient data to recommend the evaluation and clinical monitoring of persons with mild cognitive impairment due to their increased risk for developing dementia (Guideline). Screening instruments, e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination, were found to be useful to the clinician for assessing the degree of cognitive impairment (Guideline), as were neuropsychologic batteries (Guideline), brief focused cognitive instruments (Option), and certain structured informant interviews (Option). Increasing attention is being paid to persons with mild cognitive impairment for whom treatment options are being evaluated that may alter the rate of progression to dementia.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Projections of Alzheimer's disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- The Mini-Mental State Examination in General Medical Practice: Clinical Utility and AcceptanceMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1996
- Screening for dementia of the alzheimer type in the community: The utility of the clock drawing testArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1996
- A comparison of clock and pentagon drawing in Alzheimer's diseaseInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1995
- Detection of dementia of the Alzheimer type in a population-based sample: Neuropsychological test performanceJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1995
- Usefulness of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale in Screening for DementiaInternational Psychogeriatrics, 1995
- The mini-mental state examination score and the clinical diagnosis of dementiaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Italian multicentre study on dementia (SMID): A neuropsychological test battery for assessing Alzheimer's diseaseJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1990
- Age‐associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change — report of a national institute of mental health work groupDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 1986
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975