OPTIMIZATION OF PROSTATE BIOPSY STRATEGY USING COMPUTER BASED ANALYSIS
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 158 (6), 2168-2175
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68188-6
Abstract
We evaluated and optimized the detection of cancer by prostate biopsies. We developed a stochastic computer simulation model of ultrasound guided biopsies using mathematically reconstructed radical prostatectomy specimens. Use of this technique allows rapid evaluation of a variety of factors for their effect on prostate biopsy results. We used this model to analyze the effectiveness of sextant biopsies, which have been widely adopted in clinical practice. We also analyzed other biopsy schemes. A total of 607 tumor foci from 180 serially sectioned whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens was mapped and digitized. The cancers had been clinically diagnosed by a variety of biopsy strategies. Simulated parasagittal sextant biopsies were performed for each case. Forty simulation runs (each consisting of a set of 6 biopsies) were performed for each prostate, with realistic random variations in sextant biopsy localization programmed in each run. Cancer detection by biopsy was considered reliable if 90% of the simulation runs for each prostate were positive for cancer. A summary algorithm was used to map the tumor foci. Simulation of sextant biopsies demonstrated reliably detected cancer in only 107 of 147 patients (73%) in whom total tumor volume was greater than 0.5 cc. There was little correlation between total length of cancer in biopsy cores and tumor volume. Change of biopsy angle from 30 to 45 degrees did not result in significantly increased detection rates. Similarly, placing all biopsies more laterally did not increase overall detection rates. When we mapped tumor foci from the 40 cases in which sextant biopsies did not reliably detect tumor, we found that the foci were distributed in areas not biopsied by the sextant method, that is the transition zone, midline peripheral zone and inferior portion of the anterior horn of the peripheral zone. A 10-core biopsy scheme incorporating these areas as well as the posterolateral prostate reliably detected cancer in 141 of 147 patients (96%) with total tumor volumes greater than 0.5 cc. Prostate cancer of significant volume can be present in areas not sampled by standard sextant biopsies. Biopsies of the transition zone, midline peripheral zone and inferior portion of the anterior horn of the peripheral zone should be considered for re-biopsy strategy after negative sextant biopsies. Sampling of these additional areas also can be incorporated in an initial biopsy scheme to increase overall initial rates of detection of prostate cancer.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Limitations of transition zone needle biopsy findings in the prediction of transition zone cancer and tissue composition of benign nodular hyperplasiaUrology, 1996
- Editorial: Significant Versus Insignificant Prostate Cancer—Can We Identify the Tigers from the Pussy Cats?Journal of Urology, 1996
- Tumor Volume and Prostate Specific Antigen: Implications for Early Detection and Defining a Window of CurabilityJournal of Urology, 1995
- The Volume of Prostate Cancer in the Biopsy Specimen Cannot Reliably Predict the Quantity of Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen on an Individual BasisJournal of Urology, 1995
- Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsiesUrology, 1995
- Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: Indications for Ultrasound Guided Transition Zone Biopsies in the Detection of Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1995
- Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsiesUrology, 1995
- Detection of Non‐palpable Prostate Cancer. A Mathematical and Laboratory ModelBritish Journal of Urology, 1993
- Random Systematic Versus Directed Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1989
- A Note on the Generation of Random Normal DeviatesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958